Case study · Analytics
HR Analytics: engagement & compensation
Turning workforce data into questions about fairness and retention that leaders can act on.
Problem
HR teams sit on rich data about pay, engagement, and retention, but the patterns that matter — especially around fairness — are easy to miss. This project analyses HR data to surface those patterns and make them reviewable.
Approach
The work is exploratory data analysis paired with hypothesis testing: cleaning and summarising the data, then testing where differences in pay and engagement are large enough to warrant attention.
Data & inputs
- Engagement scores
- Salary and compensation records
- Retention and departmental performance signals
Key insights
- Identified a 15% salary disparity among junior roles
- Engagement was highest in departments with recognition programs
- Retention improved where compensation review was more transparent
Why it matters
Pay gaps and engagement gaps are hard to act on until they're made visible. Framing them as clear, evidence-backed findings gives an organisation something concrete to review.
Tools & technologies
Figures
Visual summaries
Salary spread
Standard deviation and range across departments.
Engagement scores
Confidence interval by performance rating.
Special-projects load
Project-count variation by job position.
Code & links
- GitHub repository — statistical summaries, charts, and hypothesis testing.