Case study · Analytics

HR Analytics: engagement & compensation

Turning workforce data into questions about fairness and retention that leaders can act on.

Problem

HR teams sit on rich data about pay, engagement, and retention, but the patterns that matter — especially around fairness — are easy to miss. This project analyses HR data to surface those patterns and make them reviewable.

Approach

The work is exploratory data analysis paired with hypothesis testing: cleaning and summarising the data, then testing where differences in pay and engagement are large enough to warrant attention.

Data & inputs

  • Engagement scores
  • Salary and compensation records
  • Retention and departmental performance signals

Key insights

  • Identified a 15% salary disparity among junior roles
  • Engagement was highest in departments with recognition programs
  • Retention improved where compensation review was more transparent

Why it matters

Pay gaps and engagement gaps are hard to act on until they're made visible. Framing them as clear, evidence-backed findings gives an organisation something concrete to review.

Tools & technologies

Python Pandas Matplotlib Seaborn

Figures

Visual summaries

Salary spread

Standard deviation and range across departments.

Salary dispersion by department

Engagement scores

Confidence interval by performance rating.

Engagement survey confidence intervals

Special-projects load

Project-count variation by job position.

Workload distribution by job title

Code & links